IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE REVIEWED
Saturday, August 1, 2020 at 9:01PM
MapleBookPublications

The observations of an off-duty police officer assisted the identification evidence in Mr. Griner's case. The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld his conviction:

Mr. Griner was in a vehicle that was observed being driven in an erratic manner and which was ultimately involved in a collision. Even though an off-duty police officer identified Mr. Griner as the driver and Mr. Griner admitted to another officer that he was the driver, Mr. Griner took the position that he was only a passenger in the vehicle. Mr. Griner was convicted in the Ontario Court of Justice of one count of care and control of a motor vehicle while impaired. R. v. Griner, 2020 ONCA 371

Article originally appeared on Investigating Impaired Drivers (https://www.lawprofessionalguides.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.