Purchase Book

4th Edition $95.00 + (S&H)

 

* If you have problems making a credit card payment, contact us for alternative payment options.

* For discounts on book orders over 5, please email us at:

MapleBookPublications@gmail.com


Table of Contents
View the 4th Edition table of contents.
Reviews of Investigating Impaired Drivers
« IMPAIRMENT - OBSERVATIONS OF THE TECHNICIAN SAVE THE DAY | Main | SECTION 7 - FAILING TO TELL AN OFFICER WHY YOU APPEAR DRUNK WHEN YOU ARE NOT, IS NOT A CRIME »
Sunday
Oct302011

CREDIBILITY - FAILURE TO TAKE NOTES RESULTS IN ACQUITTAL

The accused was charged with refusal. The officer said that he asked the accused whether her comment, 'That's it", meant she was refusing. There was nothing in his notes to indicate he in fact asked the question nor what her response may have been. When questioned further, he said that he knew he had done it because he had an independent recollection of doing so. The trial judge commented that the officer's testimony in cross-examination was surly and argumentative. He said that a failure to record every important event is not fatal to an officer's credibility and is sometimes understandable. However, the judge said that where the lacklustre note taking skills are justified with a righteous indignation and defence, of "I have an independent recollection of these events", that is not satisfactory. R. v. Navarro, 2011 ONCJ 359