Sunday
Sep182011
Section 10(b) - "No, what for," was too ambiguous.
Sunday, September 18, 2011 at 2:48PM The accused response, "No, what for," was too ambiguous and not a proper waiver of his rights under 10(b). R. v. Wycislak, 2011 BCPC 175, [2011] B.C.J. No. 1387