Purchase Book

4th Edition $95.00 + (S&H)

 

* If you have problems making a credit card payment, contact us for alternative payment options.

* For discounts on book orders over 5, please email us at:

MapleBookPublications@gmail.com


Table of Contents
View the 4th Edition table of contents.
Reviews of Investigating Impaired Drivers
« SECTIONS 10(B) AND 24(2) - ACQUITTAL SET ASIDE AND NEW TRIAL ORDERED | Main | SENTENCE - FIVE YEAR JAIL SENTENCE FOR 73 YEAR OLD ACCUSED »
Saturday
Mar232013

COLLISION - STATEMENTS BY SUSPECT DRIVER AND OBTAINING HOSPITAL RECORDS

The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld Mr. Murray's conviction for "over 80" causing bodily harm. Counsel will find this decision useful as it reviews the way the hospital blood sample results were introduced at trial through the lab technician.  R. v. Murray, 2013 ONCA 173

For more details, the trial decision is found at R. v. Murray, 2011 ONSC 3735.  

An earlier ruling, R. v. Murray, 2011 ONSC 2537, addressed the following investigative issues that often arise in cases where a collision has occurred :

Are some or all of the statements of the accused following the motor vehicle accident admissible at trial? (statements to ambulance attendants, statements before caution and after caution (in hospital), Highway Traffic Act accident report statements (in hospital)).

Are some or all of the statements of the accused admissible to support an application for a search warrant for the production of the hospital records?

A seperate earlier ruling, R. v. Murray, 2011 ONSC 2538, considered a rare Crown application to introduce an out of court statement from the now deceased mother of the accused in which she stated that "I certainly wasn't" driving the car.  She was 90 years old at the time of the collision.