Purchase Book

4th Edition $95.00 + (S&H)

 

* If you have problems making a credit card payment, contact us for alternative payment options.

* For discounts on book orders over 5, please email us at:

MapleBookPublications@gmail.com


Table of Contents
View the 4th Edition table of contents.
Reviews of Investigating Impaired Drivers
« REFUSAL - THE ACCUSED MUST PROVE ON A BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES THE FACTS ASSERTED AS GIVING RISE TO A REASONABLE EXCUSE | Main | SENTENCE - TWO YEARS LESS A DAY JAIL FOR "SERIAL DRUNK DRIVER" »
Sunday
Mar092014

SENTENCE - SIX YEARS FOR IMPAIRED CAUSING DEATH AND ONE YEAR CONSECUTIVE FOR REFUSAL

In this case, a five-month-old baby was killed and his mother’s back broken as a result of the Ms. Purtill’s offences. Ms. Purtill appealed her six year sentence for impaired/criminal negligence causing death and impaired/criminal negligence causing bodily harm. The sentencing judge had also imposed one year jail consecutive for refusal to provide a breath sample.  Her appeal was dismissed. Of note, the Ontario Court of Appeal stated:

There is no fixed term upper limit for criminal negligence causing death or impaired driving causing death.  The facts of the case must govern. 

Furthermore, there was no error in the sentencing judge’s imposition of a consecutive sentence for the offence of refusal to provide a breath sample. The seven year sentence was not unduly long or harsh in the circumstances and we are satisfied that the sentence does not offend the totality principle.  R. v. Purtill, 2013 ONCA 692