Purchase Book

4th Edition $95.00 + (S&H)

 

* If you have problems making a credit card payment, contact us for alternative payment options.

* For discounts on book orders over 5, please email us at:

MapleBookPublications@gmail.com


Table of Contents
View the 4th Edition table of contents.
Reviews of Investigating Impaired Drivers
« SECTION 258(3) - YOU CAN INFER IMPAIRMENT FROM REFUSAL, BUT NOT OPERATION | Main | APPROVED SCREENING DEVICE - CONVICTION UPHELD - FORTHWITH »
Sunday
Jul122015

DRUG RECOGNITION EXPERTS - A COURT OF APPEAL CONFIRMS THAT THEY ARE EXPERTS

Mr. Bingley’s appeal concerned the admissibility of opinion evidence given by a Drug Recognition Expert (“DRE”) on whether a person’s ability to operate a motor vehicle is impaired by a drug. Mr. Bingley said that such DRE evidence is not admissible.  The Crown said it is. The Ontario Court of Appeal agreed with the Crown:

Based on a plain reading of s. 254(3.1) of the Criminal Code, it is my view that DRE opinion evidence is admissible to prove the offence of drug-impaired driving, without the necessity of a Mohan voir dire, so long as it is established that the witness is a certified DRE as specified in the Regulations. R. v. Bingley, 2015 ONCA 439