Purchase Book

4th Edition $95.00 + (S&H)

 

* If you have problems making a credit card payment, contact us for alternative payment options.

* For discounts on book orders over 5, please email us at:

MapleBookPublications@gmail.com


Table of Contents
View the 4th Edition table of contents.
Reviews of Investigating Impaired Drivers
« SUPREME COURT OF CANADA - APPROVED INSTRUMENT MAINTENANCE RECORDS DISCLOSURE | Main | SUPREME COURT OF CANADA - APPROVED INSTRUMENT OPERATION »
Saturday
Apr292017

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA - NO APPEAL FOR "DOOR KNOCK" CASE

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the Crown’s application for leave to appeal Mr. Rogers’ impaired and exceed .08 acquittals in a case where knocking on his apartment door was the issue - R. v. Rogers, 2017 CanLII 21419 (SCC). The judgment the Crown was applying to appeal reads:

I have concluded that if a trial judge finds on all of the evidence a police officer knocked on the door to a residence for the purpose of securing evidence against the occupant, the officer is conducting a search within the meaning of s. 8 of the Charter.  As set out in Evans, a warrantless search is presumed unreasonable and the Crown has the onus of showing that it was reasonable. As found in Evans, if there is no valid warrant the search of a dwelling is unreasonable, and following Evans I find that the search in this matter to be a breach of s. 8 of the Charter. R v Rogers, 2016 SKCA 105 (see August 28, 2016 blog entry).